So many people, so many wishes. I’d rather see an evolution in games that advance both graphically and technically. If that means I have to play certain games at 30fps, that’s fine. 60+ fps is only important to me in fast paced games like multiplayer shooters. In a game like this Assassins Creed or Gotham, it would honestly be a sausage to me.
Not wanting to spend (big) money for a high-end video card, and therefore buying a console for 500 euros is your own choice, and if you are not satisfied with it, I think you have something to consider. Consoles aren’t meant for high-performance gaming, so I wonder why they seem so surprised.
What I especially like is that you try to present your opinion as fact. 1080p60 might be crucial to you, but not to me. Yes, over 60 fps is nicer, but for a device around 500 euros I also know that I don’t always expect everything and I’m fine with that. Otherwise I would have saved up and bought a computer that could do this.
Don’t get me wrong, you have every right to have an opinion and express it, but you are an absolute minority in terms of console players when I go by everyone in my area has a console. Of course, N=1 is a little bit, but most people I know with a console don’t care if they have to play at 30fps.
“Lifelong zombie fanatic. Hardcore web practitioner. Thinker. Music expert. Unapologetic pop culture scholar.”
Figures on young people’s mental health rarely tell the whole story health
Promising exoplanet TRAPPIST-1b has no atmosphere and is therefore lifeless | Sciences
Steam will not work on Windows 7 and 8.1 from January 1, 2024 – PC – News