Needs at least 1.4GHz more (4887 vs 3490MHz)

Sorry, but comparing clock speeds between two processors based on completely different instruction sets is actually below par for Tweaker.

It is already questionable to do this between AMD and Intel x86 chipsets given the difference in architecture and they also run on the same instruction set.

The clock mark is literally meaningless with modern processors. The number of clock ticks it takes varies depending on the instructions and the instructions you need depend entirely on your workload. Some instructions take several clock ticks, other instructions can do multiple clock ticks to run on a single tick, and then you still have the question of how many instructions you have to wait for I/O, cache, working memory, and how many instructions you can Paralleling the CPU core, instruction type, branch prediction, OOP, and the list of variables is endless.
And then also the fact that you’re comparing Risc with Cisc, so you’re not even in the same thing A type of instruction set.

Then let’s start talking about passive vs. active cooling. How something is cooled doesn’t make any difference in a test like a single geekbench test on mobile devices. They usually only throttle on the third or fourth run because they don’t saturate their heatsink before then.

Do you even have somewhere in black and white where you can compare Geekbench iOS scores 1:1 with Geekbench for Windows scores? Or do you just see “higher is better” without context and immediately put on blinders?

It is known that the performance per watt of apple silicon is good, but please do not try to prove this by making meaningless comparisons that have no connection to the real world.

[Reactie gewijzigd door youridv1 op 26 juni 2024 19:04]