In fact, I didn’t even look at the average gamer, but more at the niche market between top-tier gaming/consumer and business, what, for example, a digital artist can do with a Titan that they can’t with a “regular” RTX. The latter is a professional card for business use, while the latter also provides more margin for Nvidia (hence my guess that Nvidia would rather have business users buy RTX Professionals than Titans these days).

“In the past” Titan had a more logical tag position, when it was still between the “regular” 80 and sometimes the Ti segment cards and Quadro cards.

However, at present the Supers, Ti’s and 90 series cards seem to have filled this gap very well, leaving a small segment of the market for the Titan that is not served by the 90 series cards (think consumer segment on the one hand and gamer who wants the best but money is not a segment on the other) and the business cards RTX Professional that succeeded the Quadros and also grew more towards the non-business cards in terms of the sector.

For example, between the RTX 4090 and the RTX Professional ADA 6000, there is only about a 10% difference in shader count and probably less in terms of performance (because scaling is usually not linear), Titan will almost fill that, according to this rumor This is true, it doesn’t mean anything other than that Nvidia has to increase the margin on Titan and this is not something Nvidia likes to do.

[Reactie gewijzigd door Dennism op 23 juli 2024 17:37]